CSIRO SCIENTIST STILL DOESN'T GET IT

CSIRO scientist Dr Bruce Mapstone writes in The Age, "Scientists at the University of East Anglia have emerged from the six-month ''climategate'' inquiry with their reputations for honesty intact."

Dr Mapstone has apparently not read the bulk of Climategate emails.  If he had, he could not in all honesty write the above. 

He then goes on to cite the much maligned CSIRO/ BOM State of the Climate report [reviewed on May 28th and June 11 on our Older News tab] as proof that the climate is changing.

This is something we already know.  The challenge for CSIRO is to communicate to the public in a clear and comprehendable manner, the empirical evidence they have to link climate change in any signifcant way to man's activities.  

If they can't they should spend more time on research and less time on advocacy in newspapers.

LINK to article

IPCC's FIRST TEST IN A NEW WORLD OF OPENNESS

“Climate science is a matter of such global importance, that the highest standards of honesty, rigour and openness are needed in its conduct,” stated the Muir Russell report into the Climategate scandal after it found the Climatic Research Unit at the UK’s East Anglia University guilty of “a consistent pattern of failing to display the proper degree of openness.”

Lawrence Solomon writing at the National Post asks will the IPCC live up to the standards put forward by the Climategate Inquiry authors.

LINK to article

CHECKING THE HOCKEY TEAM

Peter Foster from the Financial Post tells how a small group botched and manipulated climate science

LINK to article

CLIMATEGATE WHITEWASH CONTINUES

Dr Pat Michaels has a few words to say online in The Wall Street Journal over the East Anglia and Penn State inquiries into the behaviour of publicly funded climate scientists.

LINK to article

AMAZONGATE: AT LAST WE REACH THE SOURCE

Christopher Booker from the U.K. Telegraph has been trying to get to the source of false IPCC claims about the Amazon forests for most of this year.

Complicit in the obfuscation over the source material are environment groups and associated 'researchers'.

The issue again highlights the dubious veracity of the IPCC's gold standard of 'peer review'.

LINK to article

PARLIAMENT MISLED OVER CLIMATEGATE INQUIRY

Andrew Orlowski from the website The Register reports on the response to the University of East Anglia inquiry into the Climategate affair.

[The U.K.] "Parliament was misled and needs to re-examine the Climategate affair thoroughly after the failure of the Russell report, a leading backbench MP told us today."

LINK to article