MORE ON THE CLIMATEGATE INQUIRY WHITEWASH

Joanne Nova disassembles what parades as an explanation for the CRU deception

LINK to article

A CLIMATE CATASTROPHE OR A CARBON AGENDA?

We need to be very careful that AGW, or the fears of runaway or catastrophic climate change, have not become the tools of propaganda proclaiming an advocacy position that uses an as yet unproven scientific hypothesis to drive an agenda of policy change - but is it too late asks Ian Read,  researcher, author and geographer with a special interest in climatology and vegetation, at the Online Opinion website.

LINK to article

CLIMATE SCEPTICS AND ALARMISTS AGREE?

Any Australian cut in carbon dioxide emissions is worthless if not part of a global effort. And right now it looks like the chances of a global agreement on serious emissions cuts are effectively nil says Chris Berg, editor of the IPA Review, at the National Time website.

LINK to article

RITUAL REPLACES SCIENCE INSIGHT

Some will celebrate the results of the British House of Commons Science and Technology Committee's investigation into the furore surrounding the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit as a vindication of the reputation of climate science, the work of the unit, and of all the academics involved writes Frank Furedi in The Australian. 

LINK to article

REPORT SPARKS REBUTTAL BY ALARMISTS

The latest debate on climate science to emerge centres on a paper that suggests humans played no role in the recent warming trend and that El Nino activity is mostly to blame says Sarah Clarke reporting for ABC's PM program.

LINK to article    Original paper in pdf form below.

However, there is more to this than meets the eye as outlined by Bob Carter and John McLean in a follow up article at Quadrant Online

LINK to article

EXPERT REPORT SAYS CLAIMS OF LIVESTOCK WARMING PLANET ARE FALSE

Gerald Warner at the U.K Telegraph is finding it difficult to keep up with the continuing stream of reports that debunk many of the claims about global warming.

LINK to article